Amazingly ridiculous pictures of the week
The New York Daily Post pretty much hates the artist's photo essay.
As art it doesn't impress me much but it does demonstrate the extraordinary lengths parents will go to to have people look at their baby pictures.
The artist's Nina Maria Kleivan's drivel, and I quote, "Even though comical, you're not supposed to only laugh at these pictures; you need to contemplate them, ponder where this evil comes from..." is also a total joke.
The answer, yes it is art. It is BAD art. It would have been better without the pretension. You don't see William Wegman blabbing on about his dogs, do you?
The answer, yes it is art. It is BAD art. It would have been better without the pretension. You don't see William Wegman blabbing on about his dogs, do you?
Comments